Robert Cornell: I notice in passing that “You Should Be Watching” has become “You Should Be Reading” but what I should be reading is the articles. Apart from the creator interviews I’m mostly skipping them.
The first thing that struck me about the earlier Armitage story is that it really needs to be in black and white. The second is that the stories are quite similar. It’s a decent read but, like the latest story, doesn’t seem to be making enough from the set-up.
I loved those joke binoculars. Where can I buy a pair?
Floyd Kermode: Interrogation: Glenn Fabry. First Reading: As previously intimated, I'm not into interviews in comics. I'm not the sort of person who can sit through those 'how we made this' bits on DVDs. I don't want to know the nuts and bolts of how they make it look like Arnie is dropping a tree on the Predator – I just want to enjoy it going 'ka-thunk' while he smirks through a camoflaged face. Likewise with comics interviews my first reaction is that the creators should just shut up, do their drawing and/or writing and save the “well my art caught the editor's eye at a comics con' stuff for some more specialised magazine which I'm not subscribing to.
Having said that, this a a pretty readable interview. I love Fabry's suggestion that Pat Mills should be the next Dr Who. The mind boggles. This week the Doctor frees an entire planet from the evils of non-pagan religions and capitalism. Tune in next week as the Doctor and Rose spend a month in the universe's greatest library doing research for the next Defoe story. Nose-in-a-book action just the way you like it!
Second Reading: Hey, if we're going to have interviews galore, this is the way to have them. Firstly, with a subject who has been around a bit and done some good stuff. Secondly letting the subject talk. Thirdly a minimum of fatuous interview-speak – the only example I can find here is Pat Mills being described as “scribe” rather than a writer. Knowing Mills, it's not impossible that he uses one of those quills made from a cassawory feather whilst sitting at a high table the way medieval monks did, but until we're sure, 'writer' will do.
There's some good art on display, although I would love to have seen some of Fabry's work from the Stranglers fanzine. My uninvted guest reviewer just delivered some tea and told me she didn't like Fabry's covers for 'the dead', because 'what have children got to look forward to'. Wimp that I am, I did not reply “I'm 47. It's not for children you dozy mare'. Any more chat and I'm worried she'll finish the review for me.
New Comics: The Rise and Fall (and rise again?) of com.x. First reading: snore! Nice pictures! on to Darren Dead
Second reading: Three nicely illustrated pages about a comics company that sounds like a very good thing indeed. What more is there to say? I could have done with more details about the stories in the comics, but that's just me. I'm impressed with the guys who started the company and their comics sound awesome. What's more, they're back, sort of, so there are more comics for us to buy. Much as I'd like the Megazine to be just comics, comics and more comics, it is very broadminded and cool of the editor to have articles encouraging people to buy stuff he doesn't profit from. You don't get Marvel doing that. That's the kind of spirit which got me into 2000AD in the first place.
You Should be reading....: DC: The New Frontier. First reading: save it for the second reading
Second reading: The comic being reviewed sounds like fun, although it's not entirely clear that someone who knows as little about DC comics as I do would enjoy it. Berridge reassures us that it's still fun in the old fashioned way, although he spends more time on what he calls 'know-it-all references than on explaining why New Frontier is terrific retro fun. I get the general idea – darkness in comics is played out, it'd be nice to have the simple fun of yesteryear and here it is. I'll keep an eye peeled for this.
Sinema City: Edinburgh Film Festival. First reading: Snore, move on . I'm not interested in horror movies or the Edinburgh Film Festival.
Second Reading: A punchy, well-written round up of what's available in the way of horror from the Edinburgh film festival. An Austrailian move about nature attacking unsuspecting hikers is being remade. I've never heard of the original but must see this. I didn't know we had any wildlife here that could threaten people. There's always razorback and those feral camels, I suppose. Do koalas fall on them in a scary way? Must see this. The rest of it is well written and to the point if you're into horro. I'm not but guess that a lot of Megazine readers are. It seems the boom in zombie/classics is continuing – there's a review here for a Romeo and Juliet meet zombies movie. I'm getting tired of zombies from just reviews without seeing any of the movies.
New Movies: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen, Moon,Antichrist, Ichi
First Reading: Did you know there was a new Transformers movie? Did you suspect it's a big dumb waste of time? The number of people for whom this would be new information could be counted by a cat. The number of people who need to know that Tranformers 2 is a big dumb movie and who read the Megazine must be zero, given the comics lack of selling power amongst cats. True, there's a nice picture of Ms Megan Fox's breasts next to a sneery quote about the movie, but for that people read Nuts, Zoo etc. Read on to see if there's any comics left in this here Megazine
Second Reading: Now I've actually read the unneccessary review. I've seen Transformers 2 and found it phenomenally stupid – like flicking through a years worth of Lad Mags at high speed in a game centre, so can't agree with the positive aspects of this review. Besides for funnyness about Transformers, you can't go past Charlie Brooker telling us that watching the movie was like having an angry washing machine shit on your face.
As superfluous reviews go, this is well written. Non-superfluous reviews follow. Moon sounds good and the the review tells me just what I need to know to decide whether to see it. We gather that Antichrist is disgusting but fun if you like films about films having the right to 'offend against acceptable thinking'. I think that means that it's fun to see films which push the boundaries of what's appalling and what isn't. From this review I can't tell if AntiChrist is a pile of cobblers or a brave experiment of some kind and I suspect the reviewer is in two minds about it too. Ichi seems to be derviative of Zatoichi but enjoyable, with a female lead.
Armitage: First Cut (bonus comic. Sorry 'Graphic Novel which looks exactly like a comic' I'll refer to it as 'the free comic' from here on).
First Reading: What is it with the British and Masons? This excellent bonus free comic has the same Masonic skullduggery that enlivened the Viz strip 'Bodley Basin, Monumental Mason'. Continuing the trend to use the extra comic to highlight new stuff in the Meg itself, we have here some vintage Armitage. It's not a bad idea, although it runs the risk of the vintage stuff showing up the new - like bundling songs from Let It Bleed with A Bigger Bang would be for the Rolling Stones. Kind of.
There's a nice mix of scary, futuristic and silly in this early Armitage story. Some very artsy pudding-bowl haircuts. I rack my brains but don't remember this look from the early 90s. Must google some old Shriekback videos and see. A bonus Judge Hershey story also from the early 90s. The waitress isn't peeking at this one, but 'artistic' would be the word. Looks a bit stilted. At the very end there are two early 90s Megazine covers. One is imposing and follows Glen Fabry's dictum that a cover should be as striking as the Union Jack. In fact is has the Union Jack with Armitage, Steel and some unnamed Brit-Cit Judge looming impressively at us. The other is an absolutely foul picture of Judge Anderson, put there to remind me to stop imagining that early Megazine covers were all awesome.
Second Reading: I like this. It makes me think a little less of Armitage's recent, more frivolous outings. There's a bit of detective work which doesn't make much sense if looked at in the cold light of day but which is very satisfying to read. You could say the same thing about Sherlock Holmes and a lot of Agatha Christie's work too.