left top navicational image
Navigational image
Browse 2000AD Review
 

2000AD Review Poll
Sinister Dexter - should the gunsharks be permanently retired?
  

About 2000AD Review
 
 
 
 
  Email us

 

Home ¦ Reviews ¦ ABC Warriors: Rage Against the Machines

2000AD Review Extra 20th August 05

ABC Warriors: Rage Against the Machines
ABC Warriors: Rage Against the Machines
Mike Wild

Buy this book from Amazon.co.uk

What to Expect: Indestructible giant war robots battling indestructible giant war robots. On Mars.

Review by Richmond Clements

As with so many on these Black Flame books, I didn’t know what to expect when I started reading this one. Like every other creation of Pat Mills, these characters are synonymous with their creator. As he’s pretty much the only writer on these characters, Mills has a knowledge of them that is second to none. So, seeing this novel was not the work of Mills, but of newcomer Mike Wild, I was apprehensive. Pat’s contribution to the novels, The Medusa War was a fun romp, could this keep up the standard?

My question was answered as early as the third page of chapter one. The action opens with an attack on an airport by Martian tripods. We see it through the eyes of a woman called Maggie. Maggie was an exotic dancer: at the Whores & Cart. Yup, the puns here are well up with the finest in Mills’ cannon. I was able to hit the ground running after that. With Mills’ novel, it was halfway through the book before I caught on to the tongue in cheek nature of the piece, not so here.

This book is very funny. The puns are bad. In fact, thinking back, I can’t think of many jokes that didn’t work. There’s a nice joke that’s riffed on a couple of times, where the ABCs are confused with characters from other comics, as well as knowing nods to the reader and their knowledge of 2000AD, Doctor Who and many other cult shows and movies. This brings me to one of the few points that bothered me. The various winks to the reader about old movies and shows are fine, but occasionally, they break the fourth wall somewhat. Examples being Joe Pineapples being aware of who George Pal is.

But if the book has a fault, it’s that there’s too much going on. From the beginning, the Warriors are split up into ones and twos on their various individual adventures, which is fine. But sometimes it’s four or five chapters between scenes with one of them, and if you’re not reading a large chunk in one sitting, you run the risk of not knowing what’s going on when eventually you return to them.

Still, when we do meet up with them, it’s always worth the wait. As well as being funny, the book also has it’s fair share of action scenes. Add to this a couple of scenes that are punch-the-air cool, where Wild manages to absolutely nail the characters he’s writing about. As cliff-hanger ending go, the one Wild carefully constructs here, building it nicely throughout the length of the book, it’s a corker.

I can’t wait for the next one.

Buy this book from Amazon.co.uk

BONUS SECTION:

We contacted Pat Mills to ask him about this and future novels in the range.

Why did you decide not to write this novel?

I never intended to write the second ABC novel. My intention was always to start the series off and then pass it onto another writer. This was because I simply wouldn't have enough time to do the ABC Warriors as well as GW Slaine novels, which had to take precedence.

Subsequently Slaine didn't work out for two reasons (1) Because I wanted to start it at the beginning with "Young Slaine" and small stories, closely following the original comic strip , and GW wanted epic stories including time travel from the beginning which I told them many times I thought was a grave mistake. (2) Eventually GW decided they wanted to do Slaine , and possibly other books, using an established author, rather than myself, the original writer. This they feel will result in larger sales.

Did you have a say in picking the writer? And did you give him any advice?

I originally intended my co-writer and colleague on the first novel, Alan Mitchell, to write this novel

A) so I could keep some sense of direction on where it was going. I would have been very happy to have given Alan my input and that was the plan. As he co-wrote the first book, I felt it would be a good launch pad.

B) I chose the original writer because I think the British system of a new writer writing a character that was created by another writer is morally wrong, unless the original writer has agreed to it. As the past history of comics sadly shows all too clearly, this kind of "work for hire" system is not only morally wrong, it is short-sighted, parochial and will eventually be done away with under EEC law. In Europe, where I mainly work, they think we are in the Stone Age when I describe how the copyright system works in Britain (And America) where a writer and artist's creation is totally owned or controlled by a publisher, and the creators have no say in what happens to it.

Alan Mitchell decided not to write the second book. I then put forward another writer whose detailed proposal was okayed by GW, but then they changed their minds and went for their own choice of writer.

After that, I thought it best not to get involved any further. Because of GW's inaccurate presentation on Amazon, it was necessary for me to remind GW not to associate my name with this second book , so it is very clear I have not written, endorsed, edited or was connected with it in any way. I have made the same point to them where forthcoming Slaine novels are concerned

The plot of this book is tied in tightly with your current Warriors story arc, was there a lot of planning that went into the relationship between book and strip?

I guess the writer of the second book would have followed the strip closely, which I'm pleased about from a continuity point of view. Despite my considerable reservations about the conditions under which these GW books are created, of course I would want them to be written well.




This is an unofficial site. All characters and related indicia are © and TM of their respective owners.
Original content (c) 2002 Gavin Hanly (contact 2000AD Review).