| Home
¦ Features ¦ John
McCrea interview part 2
 |
Chopper
|
|
RC: Chopper
was the next thing you did for 2000AD? Did you and Garth ask for that gig?
JMcC: That
was in the first issue of the Megazine wasn't it? I think Garth and I had just
been over in the Fleetway offices, and we went out on the piss with John Wagner
and a few of the guys. Crisis was grinding, or had ground to a halt; Wagner turned
to me as we were heading down to the pub and said, 'John would you and Garth like
to do this thing for the first issue of the Megazine?'
I though wow! It
was pretty cool to be in the first issue of a new launch.
I think Certain
bits of it were reasonably done on my part, I don't think Garth is particularly
happy with his writing in it. Some of the writing's not up to scratch, but then
neither is some of my drawing.
I enjoyed it, but
it was more painted artwork. God knows I was getting highly sick of it. I never
got into the business to do painted art. I grew up reading Marvel and DC, that's
what I liked, Jack Kirby and Steve Ditko.
PJ: You
were talking to Glenn Fabry about that time; he was helping you with the painting?
JMcC: Well,
no not really. I was just ripping Glenn off! Just looking at his artwork and trying
to analyse how he did it, and turning out inferior copies of it. As were many
people at the time. Dermot Power created his entire career out of that. Glenn
rang him up one time, and said, 'How about introducing me to some of the movie
guys you're working for,' and Dermot said, 'No.'
So no-one thought
too highly of Dermot after that. I don't think he talks to any of us anymore,
now he's living on his Lear jet.
So anyway, I really
was sick of painted artwork, and I still to this day don't think comics should
have any painted art. Maybe the cover, some Preacher covers were awesome. But
comics painted aren't comics, it's not what the medium's about. It slows things
down, it distracts from the story. The Megazine actually wanted Middenface McNulty
to be painted, and I managed to talk them into not making me paint it. Then I
really put the nail in the coffin by doing it so cartoony.
 |
Fast
Forward (Future Shock)
|
|
PJ: You
did a Future Shock that was really cartoony. You said, 'I don't think they want
it this cartoony, but I don't care!'
JMcC: Oh
yeah. I did some samples for Burt (Richard Burton).
So I did all these
realistic samples, and when he said yes, I drew it and waited until they day of
the deadline and sent it in, so they had no choice but to run it. He did tell
me that if he'd got it any earlier, he'd have made me redraw it. And told me I
was never working for 2000AD again. I was like, 'Bollocks! Shot myself in the
foot there.'
PJ: But
you kind of knew that was going to happen...
JMcC: I
did, didn't I? I have a habit of doing that. My career is littered with these
sort of mistakes. Which is why I did a talk one time at UKCAC, about how not to
break into comics.
PJ: You
had that lovely panel of someone walking up the stairs, and it was sideways. It
was a really well drawn picture, it was just such a weird angle.
JMcC: It
was She-Hulk, walking up the stairs in my Avengers samples. It was sideways, because
I couldn't figure out how else to cram it all in!
RC: You
did the Demon. You mentioned Kirby earlier. If there's one character you automatically
associate with him it's that one. What was it like taking that over?
JMcC: You
know, to a degree, when I took it over, I'd kind of forgotten that Kirby had created
it! I remembered Matt Wagner's four issue series, but really I was looking at
Val Semeckis' stuff, and I thought that while Val's a very good artist, he made
him look like a big teddy bear. So I went in with no desire to keep it looking
like it was looking, I wanted to shake it up completely. The comic was going to
be cancelled, so our proviso when Garth and I went in was just to shake it up
as much as possible.
So we just did
whatever the fuck we wanted, and as we went on, it just got crazier. And we built
the readership up a little bit. In fact in 'Zero Hour', issue 0 of The Demon it
sold incredibly well, but it still wasn't selling well enough for those days.
PJ: Where
would it be now?
JMcC: Certainly
top forty. It's ridiculous, back then it was #150 with a bullet. It was fun, we
had a great old time doing what we wanted as seeing if we could get away with
it. And of course creating Hitman.
RC: Was
that always intended to be a spin-off?
 |
Hitman
|
|
JMcC: Oh God
no, we had no idea. It was for an annual, and for all the annuals that year, DC
were basically trying to use up all the names they possibly could, like Bloodstrike,
or Arse Force or what have you. You know, use them all up so that Marvel couldn't
do it. PJ:
Arse Force Five!
JMcC: God,
I mean how stupid could you be? They're always going to find some other combination.
I guess the writing on the wall was 'Speedball'.
PJ: Crackhead?
JMcC: No
we had no idea... we just created a character we both wanted to draw. We're huge
fans of Chow Yun Fat and The Killer. I've fond memories of heading down to Will
Simpson's house drinking into the small hours and watching The Killer on video.
We just wanted to do an homage to it, and didn't think it'd spin off into its
own title.
I remember when
Garth first said to me that DC wanted to pick it up as an ongoing series. I thought
to myself, 'Well, I'll sign up for the first twelve.'
I honestly couldn't
see it lasting more than that. I could not see how Garth could manage to make
it interesting longer than that. I did say to him that if it didn't last as long
as Gunfire, which was another one of the Bloodline spin-offs...
PJ: Which
we all remember...
 |
Hitman
& Superman
|
|
JMcC: Well,
exactly! I mean, it was the shitest comic ever. Gunfire basically was this guy,
and whatever he picked up became a weapon, so you had these pictures of him with
a wrench in his hand. It was just the shitest fucking thing on the planet! We
did parody Gunfire, where at the end of it he turned his arse into a hand grenade
and blew himself up.
As it turned out
I stuck with it a while longer than twelve issues, because Garth kept writing
better and better stories, it was a scream. It did alright, it had its run. We
always had it in mind that it would be a finite series. You can't write about
an amoral killer for too long without people going, 'You know, maybe if this guy
is living by the gun, he should be dying by the gun.'
We just had to
wrap it up a little earlier than we expected, because sales were getting a bit
low towards the end. They said to us, 'You could keep going and do the last incidental
stories you want to do, but it might get cancelled before that, or you could wrap
it up by issue 60 and be sure of it getting out there.'
Which was very
decent of them to give us that option. They did the same with The Demon. They
said, 'It's going to be canned, and we should be doing it now, but we'll keep
it going until you've finished this major arc and wrap it up the way you want
to.' DC and indeed every comics company, has a history littered with occasions
where things like that did not happen.
I remember when
Hitman first came out, I was signing at a table in the NEC in Birmingham beside
John Wagner, and John asked me what I was up to. I showed him an issue, and he
was looking through it. He liked it, and he asked how many copies it had sold.
I told him 45,000/50,000 or something. He said, 'If this had come out five years
ago, it's be selling 150,000 copies, and you'd have made a ton of royalties.'
'John, I don't
want to hear that!'
PJ: Do you
think comics will ever claw back to that level? The quality's a lot better now.
JMcC: The
quality is better, but there's so much competition. Sales went up in the past
year, the top ten now are all over 100,000 copies. But I don't know if that's
because there are more readers, or that they are just buying less of the smaller
titles.
But now there are
not enough comics in newsagents. There's the Spider-man and X-Men reprints.
PJ: But
there are more in newsagents now than there were a few years ago.
 |
Batman
|
|
JMcC: I'm not
sure that'll have a knock on effect in making long term comics readers. They're
playing on kids who've watched the movie. I dunno if it'll ever go up again. It'll
never reach the level it was at in the '60s. I remember reading an old issue of
Batman from then, and I love reading the old letters columns, to see the people
mentioned who've maybe went on to work in them. PJ:
I've got an old issue of 2000AD with your picture of Judge Toyah in it.
JMcC: What
about my Rogue Sucker? I earned some more Galactic Groats for that one!
But I was reading
the letters in the Batman comic, and someone had written in say the last storyline
wasn't very good, and the art wasn't up to its usual standard. The single line
reply was brilliant in its arrogance. '3,000,000 people can't be wrong.'
|