left top navicational image
Navigational image
Browse 2000AD Review
 

2000AD Review Poll
Will you buy the revamped Megazine?
 

About 2000AD Review
 
 
 
 
  Email us

 

Home ¦ Features ¦ Gordon Rennie Interview Part 2

Gordon Rennie - A 2000 AD Review Interview

4th June 04

Back to Part 1


In your column in the Megazine, you seem at times to actively court controversy. Have you ever written anything, eer in the column, or anywhere else, that you have regretted?

I've written loads of stuff I've regretted. So has any other writer. As for the column, I don’t think I’ve said anything controversial at all in it. It depends how seriously you want to take it, I suppose. It's depressing how easy it is to wind up certain types of people. Lots of people want to be 'controversial'. I don’t want to be one of them. You can usually spot them a mile off, because they'll tell you never hesitate to tell you how shocking and controversial their work apparently is. Twats, the lot of them.

2000 AD - Gordon Rennie interview
Rennie's last Rogue?
Rumour has it you'll be writing no more Rogue? Is this true, and if it is, why?

Yeah, the last series - Realpolitik - is my last run on the strip. I told Tharg I'd be stepping down after that one, so I don't know what's going to happen to the strip or character now. I suspect he may disappear back into the chem-mists of Nu Earth for a while again. With Realpolitik, I decided to do my one thing and do a story about fascist power politics, which is a bit of an obsession of mine, frankly.

I was hesitant at taking on the Rogue job; the strip seemed to be a bit of a scriptdroids' graveyard, and Rogue's not....well....the most in-depth of characters. He's vaguely like Dredd in a way, possessing a fairly single mindset because he was purpose-created to do one thing, but with Dredd you've got a pretty big cast of supporting characters like other Judges, and a city of 400 million mad crazy people for him to interact with. Rogue, by his very name, is a loner, and he doesn't really interact with anyone other than the biochips, who are….well….also not the most in-depth of characters. The fact that it's locked into an already-established continuity, and we know what happens to him and the Traitor General in the end was always going to be a problem. My first instinct was to do a bit of a reboot, and change things around - especially with the back-story and the biochips - but that wasn't on the cards. Rogue had been rebooted once, and the Friday stuff was a bit of a disaster, really so I can see why Tharg wasn't keen on doing it again.

Nu Earth's still a great setting for a story, and there's a lot there we haven't seen yet. Although I tried to cover a lot more of it in my forthcoming Rogue novel - plug, plug, again. I'm in discussions with The Mighty One about doing a Nu Earth/Nort-Souther war spin-off strip called The Eighty-Sixers, but that's on the backburner at the moment.

I'm also doing writing work on the Rogue Trooper computer game, so I suppose Rogue and I haven't quite parted company yet.

2000 AD - Gordon Rennie interview
Rennie's first Dredd with PJ Holden
"Gordon loves anything that takes him away from work" The words of PJ Holden. How true are they?

He's a lying little spudmunching bastard who better watch his lip. I can end careers with a phone call. I've done it before, you know...

Do you, generally speaking, get to choose the artist who works on one of your scripts?

Sometimes, especially if it's something major. Stuff like one-off Dredds tend to go to whoever's available at the time, or Tharg might phone me up and say "Artist X is looking for work. Can you write a Dredd for them?" Other times, I pitch some ideas, the editor tells me which ones he wants and then he tells me what artists he's got in mind for them. Unless I make particularly strong noises of disapproval down the phone at the mention of any of those names, it'll go to one of them.

2000 AD - Gordon Rennie interview
Couch potatoes
Have you ever had an artist turn in a version of something you had written, and thought 'Oh No! What have they done?!'

Yeah, but what can you do? Not get on the internet and whine about how it was all the artist’s fault your story sucked, that’s for sure. The reverse happens too, of course. You turn in a script you maybe didn't think was so great, and the artist really brings it to life. That happened on a Dredd story I did called 'Couch Potatoes'. I quite liked it, but I thought there were too many corny lines in it about mashed potatoes. "Blow it into French fries!" Stuff like that. Cliff Robinson did an incredible job on it, though, and people absolutely loved it. One day we'll do a Couch Potatoes sequel, maybe.

I've read interviews with writers who say they never read another writers work, for fear of borrowing from it, and others who do so freely and feel no guilt. Which camp do you fall into?

Dunno. I hardly read any comics these days, to be honest. I buy collections and graphic novels, but not monthly comics. This "never read another writers work, for fear of borrowing from it" sounds like a lot of crap though, frankly. Writers don't work in a vacuum, and nor should they. Besides, comics is inherently a rip-off medium...

Go to part 3


This is an unofficial site. All characters and related indicia are © and TM of their respective owners.
Original content (c) 2002 Gavin Hanly (contact 2000AD Review).