left top navicational image
Navigational image
Browse 2000AD Review
 

2000AD Review Poll
Will you buy the revamped Megazine?
 

About 2000AD Review
 
 
 
 
  Email us

 

Home ¦ Features ¦ 2006AD Review

2006AD Review
31st December 06

1 ¦ 2 ¦ 3 ¦ 4 ¦ 5 ¦ 6 ¦ 7 ¦ 8 ¦ 9 ¦ 10 ¦ 11 ¦ 12 ¦ 13 ¦ 14
Previous page Page 11 Next page

Worst thing about 2000AD this year

2000 AD -  2006AD Review
The Megazine revamp

Gavin Hanly: Unfortunately, it has to be the Megazine's decline. It's particularly annoying that Dez Skinn's unwarranted outburst at the Eagle awards, when the Megazine got a deserved award for its 2005 issues, was followed by such a reduction in quality when the page rate and strips were culled. Some rapid rethinking of the strip content (particularly with the reprints, which have become staid since Charley's War was dropped) is certainly needed. While the latest run of tales seems a massive improvement, there's just not enough new content to make the price point attractive. A rethink on the article content would also be highly recommended, as I don't think the Megazine is the place for "insight into the movie scene" despite the recent editorial. There's hope for an improvement next year - but I think there has to be a considerable structural revamp of the megazine, seeing as so much of it is taken up by articles which I just don't read any more...

The other disappointment about 2006 was the understated way that both prog 1500 and the start of Origins were pushed in the media. Hopefully there will be a much more concerted effort at blowing the trumpet at next year's anniversary.

Finally - the loss of Tom Frame was a massive blow to the comic and he will be much missed.

James Mackay: The Megazine’s problem is that when a dud runs, it takes a very long time to disappear.  This year the Megazine had a string of duds.  However, the latest issue’s rise in quality (Peter Doherty on Devlin Waugh is just inspired!) gives me great hope that 2007 will be a much better year for the title.

2000 AD -  2006AD Review
Stone Island

Robert Cornell: It’s a bit lazy to go for an actual story in this category but Stone Island was an absolute train wreck.

Ugly art, characters so thin one of them didn’t even have a name, pages of dozy exposition and an ending that seemed to have drifted in from another, even more terrible, storyline. Like a direct to video Aliens rip-off from the 1980s. Yuk! Take a look, move on, and try not to have nightmares.

Alex Frith: The seemingly endless debate about whether or not the Megazine will / ought to fold and disappear. It's a worthy publication - be more supportive, people!

Stephen Watson: Sinister Dexter making their not unexpected but decidedly unwelcome return from the grave.

Linton Porteous: The Megazine is by no means an awful comic:  there's a lot of very good content, but overall, it's been a disappointment this year compared to the weekly. 

Five out the six strip slots have been below par, which leaves just Dredd, the signature strip, to see it through.  The biggest hits of last year, The Simping Detective and Cursed Earth Koburn, were hardly used.  The reprint Dredd can only ever be a secondary consideration for me, because I've read it all before.  Black Siddha was an unfortunate mess.  Even the incredibly well-drawn Fiends of the Eastern Front failed to excite, moving at a snail's pace at six pages per month and managing (somehow) to make vampires involved in the siege of Stalingrad seem dull.  (A single-sitting re-read may be different, but that's not how it was presented.)  The Small Press slot, whilst throwing up some interesting and sometimes astounding work, generally fell flat, and with Tales of the Black Museum being played for comedy effect (without ever actually being in any way amusing), it seemed a lost opportunity. 

Each of these on their own wouldn't be so bad – but put altogether it made the comic a disappointment to read.  When you have to wait a month between reads, the wait should be worth it.  My opinion, which is in no way a snub and might well be missing the point, is that the Megazine and 2000AD may need separate editors if both are to flourish. 
2000 AD -  2006AD Review
The Megazine

Andrew Howe: The decision to strip the Meg back to four stories, several of which ran for two-thirds of the year.  If you don’t like Black Siddha (I don’t), can’t see the point of reviving the classic Fiends of the Eastern Front (I can’t), and feel a trifle cynical about reprint material in the age of Extreme, you’re left with precious little reason to part with your hard-earned on a monthly basis.  I don’t know how the profits on this enterprise are going, but I fear for cancellation if matters don’t improve. 

Honourable mention – the unwelcome news that two of my favourite strips of 2005 – Anderson and Caballistics – were going on an extended break.  Then again, we campaigned for more Nikolai back in the day, so we should be careful what we wish for.

Bryan Coyle: He's since apologised, but Dez Skinn making an arse of himself lambasting the Megazine while presenting it an award.  My personal take is that, for someone like myself who only heard about the comments he made after the event, his noncommital shrug of an apology and the seeming absence of all things 2000ad-related in the pages of British journal Comics International (even the American Previews features 2000AD more regularly) just seems like a baffling bit of sour grapes.  I've no idea why he'd have it in for 2000AD, but he does seem very disparaging of the book and its readers in general - I freely admit that this is a subjective opinion.

Adam Crabtree: A bad year for the Judge Dredd Megazine’s reputation. I managed to blag a subscription for Christmas, so I was inevitably more upbeat in my appraisals of this loudly slated run in the title’s history. Black Siddah confirmed Pat Mills’ ker-azy disposition anew and came in for a storm of criticism. The Fiends of the Eastern Front revival from David Bishop and Colin Macneill (who had a serious case of over exposure this year; he does good stuff, but those faces of his… y’need a break from anything after twelve solid months!) was recognised as a fine bit of comics storytelling but not really suitable for loooong-term serialisation. There was a format change, which I have mixed feelings about; the emphasis on comic content gave it more focus (and the content was juicier) but I miss the articles (NOT the turgidly boring film reviews that are still running).

Still, we’re now ready to begin a fresh new year with Jack Point, Devlin Waugh et al giving a strong early showing. Time to see what this new editor’s made of, wot?

David Knight: Filler stories perform several very necessary functions in an anthology comic like 2000AD. The downside is that, Future Shocks aside, they’re rarely enjoyable and they make me wish for a short Sinister Dexter adventure in their place. Saying that, at least 3 (or 4) stories in Prog 2007 failed to pack the requisite punch; one of which was the Sinister Dexter interlude.

Martin Charlton: The reduction in quality of the Megazine, from 100 pages, with a spine and 6 new strips every month, to staples, inferior paper quality, an identity crisis, no separate editor to differentiate it from the prog, and only 4 new strips a month. A real shame.

WR Logan: The loss of Henry Flint may be America’s gain but definitely the galaxies greatest loss. The best art droid of his generation with an imagination unsurpassed by any current model of art droid its amazing to think that his last appearance in the Megazine was October 2005 and his last appearance in 2000 was way back in April. As much as I wish Henry all the best and hope that he becomes as well known across the pond as he is to us I also hope that we get to see his work once again in the pages of one of Tharg’s publications in 2007.

2000 AD -  2006AD Review
Malone

Pete McCosh: Malone. The essence of the story (mysterious man comes to town, starts kicking ass and is revealed to have a dark secret in his past) is painfully obvious from the outset. It is only the nature of this secret that causes a surprise and makes the story in any way relevant or worthwhile. However, this connection back to another story does not retrospectively improve the lumpen, clichéd writing. There’s a thin line between writing a homage or pastiche of any given genre and sinking beneath the waves of its conventions. Malone follows the latter path.

I wasn’t very complimentary about Simon Coleby’s art before and I have reappraised it slightly. His sketchy backgrounds and use of greys to emphasise the foreground is pretty cool, but his figures – the heads in particular – are still rotten.

Joseph Saxton: Consistent low quality in the Megazine, okay it wasn’t awful but the Megazine was very weak for too long in most peoples opinions and, whilst the strips are looking up, it's still lacking in identity to justify having two separate publications.

1 ¦ 2 ¦ 3 ¦ 4 ¦ 5 ¦ 6 ¦ 7 ¦ 8 ¦ 9 ¦ 10 ¦ 11 ¦ 12 ¦ 13 ¦ 14
Previous page Page 11 Next page


This is an unofficial site. All characters and related indicia are © and TM of their respective owners.
Original content (c) 2002 Gavin Hanly (contact 2000AD Review).